Showing posts with label divergence theorem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label divergence theorem. Show all posts

Trace, Laplacian, the Heat equation, divergence theorem

The aim of this article is to help build an intuition for the trace of a matrix, "the sum of the elements on the diagonal" -- the basic idea is that the trace is an "average" of some sort, an average of the action of an operator or a quadratic form. We'll make this idea clearer with an example from classical physics: the heat equation.



Consider an $n$-dimensional space with some temperature distribution $T(\vec{x},t)$. We wish to set up a differential equation for this function.

In the case that $n = 1$, this differential equation is exceedingly easy to write down, considering the difference $(T(x+dx)-T(x))-(T(x)-T(x-dx))$ as the double-derivative upon division by $dx^2$. More rigorously, what we're doing here is applying a localised version of the fundamental theorem of calculus. I.e. we're writing down:

$$\begin{align}
\lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \frac{1}{\Delta x}(T'(x + \Delta x) - T'(x)) &= \lim_{\Delta x \to 0} \frac{1}{{\Delta x}}\int_x^{\Delta x} {T''(x)dx}  \\
& = T''(x)
\end{align}
$$
More generally, we may consider the $n$-dimensional case.

Analogously to before, one may try to look at temperature flows in each direction -- here, we have an integral, done on the boundary of an infinitesimal region $V$ (this symbol will also represent the volume of the region):

$$ \frac{{\partial T}}{{\partial t}} = \lim_{V \to 0} \frac{\alpha }{V}\int_{\partial V} {\hat u\,dS \cdot \vec \nabla T} $$
At this point, one may apply the divergence theorem, converting this to:

$$\frac{{\partial T}}{{\partial t}} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{V \to 0} \frac{\alpha }{V}\int\limits_V {\vec \nabla  \cdot \vec \nabla T\;dV}  = \alpha{\left| {\vec \nabla } \right|^2}T$$
In this sense, the divergence theorem is analogous to the fundamental theorem of calculus for manifolds with boundaries that are more than one-dimensional (see the bottom of the page for a link to a formalisation/an abstraction based on this analogy). But there are more ways to intuitively understand this. Note how the Laplacian is the trace of the Hessian matrix (note: we use $\vec{\nabla}^2$ to refer to the Hessian and $\left|\vec\nabla\right|^2$ to refer to the Laplacian):

$${\left| {\vec \nabla } \right|^2}T = {\mathop{\rm tr}} \left({\vec{\nabla} ^2}T\right)$$
The trace of a matrix is fundamentally linked to some notion of averaging -- the simplest interpretation of this is that it is the mean of the eigenvalues. But more relevant to our situation, it can be shown that the trace of a matrix is the expected value of the quadratic form defined by the matrix on the unit sphere -- or on a general sphere $S$:

$${\mathop{\rm tr}} A = \frac{1}{S}\int_S {\frac{{\Delta {x^T}A\,\Delta x}}{{\Delta {x^T}\Delta x}}\,dS} $$
One may check that taking the limit as $\Delta x \to 0$, substituting $\nabla^2$ for the operator and writing ${\overrightarrow \nabla ^2}f\,d\vec x = \overrightarrow \nabla  f$, one gets the original "average of directional derivatives" expression.

Can you interpret the other coefficients of the characteristic polynomial in terms of statistical ideas?


Further reading:
  • Using the "infinitesimal region" idea to define divergence, curl and Laplacian rigorously: Khan Academy
  • An abstraction based on the "analogy" between FTC, Divergence Theorem, Navier-Stokes Theorem, etc. Stokes' theorem (Wikipedia)